Summer House

A Review of What Works

Introduction

Alcoholism affects millions of people in the United States alone. According to the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse (NIAA), a division of the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland USA, at least 700,000 Americans receive treatment for this disease every day. Some kinds of treatment, such as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) have been around for many years while others are relatively new. Clinical research to determine the effectiveness of these various treatments has resulted in some important findings.

In October 2000 the NIAA released a summary of its conclusions based on fifteen years of research on alcohol treatments. According to the NIAA, self-help programs such as AA, psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy, either alone or in combination, are in fact effective and do reduce the use of alcohol.

Alcoholics Anonymous

Of all the treatments for alcohol misuse, Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) is probably the most well known. In AA, a form of "self-help" treatment, participants take part in a series of mental, written and verbal activities that can lead to recovery and abstinence. In one study, alcoholic patients who received inpatient and outpatient psychotherapy, as well as AA, had better outcomes than those patients who attended only one kind of treatment.

It is thought that AA helps people because it provides a new social network that replaces the alcohol abuser’s usual group of friends who drink with him or her, and provides a fellowship that inspires motivation and lends support toward the goal of reaching and maintaining abstinence. AA also teaches a set of coping skills so that, when stressed, the alcohol abuser has more constructive ways of coping, and does not need to turn to alcohol to escape his or her problems.

Another study, conducted at a Department of Veteran Affairs hospital, indicated that those alcoholic patients who underwent either cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) or a 12-step program in combination with CBT did better, over the long run, than those who participated in the 12-step program alone. (CBT entails learning coping skills, new ways of interpreting and reacting to stressful situations, and changing one’s destructive or maladaptive behavior patterns.) The patients who received the combination treatment stayed sober longer and were able to hold down a job for longer periods than those patients who received only CBT.

Both of these studies seem to show that a combination of some kind of psychotherapy and a 12-step program such as AA produces the most beneficial results for patients who use alcohol in excess.

Other beneficial treatments

Other promising treatments of alcohol abuse that are being studied include Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET); couples therapy; Brief Intervention Therapy; dual-addiction treatment; and pharmacotherapy.

Motivational Enhancement Therapy: The key component of MET is an interviewing technique conducted by a trained psycho-therapist. The goal of this method is to increase an individual’s degree of motivation to stop drinking and to maintain abstinence. This is accomplished by the therapist gauging the individual’s readiness to change and then adjusting feedback accordingly. An intensive, individualized interviewing strategy, MET was demonstrated to overcome many patients’ disinclination to address their alcohol problem in treatment and increase their willingness to change.
Couples Therapy: Patients who include their non-alcohol abusing partners in their psychotherapy are more apt to attend therapy, and more likely to alter their unhealthy drinking habits. In one model of couples therapy known as Behavioral-Marital Therapy (BMT), communication and conflict-resolution skills are taught. When a relapse-prevention plan was added to this model, alcohol abstinence rates were even higher.

Brief Intervention Therapy: This treatment method usually takes place when alcohol users visit their primary care physicians. It typically entails the imparting of information about the negative consequences of drinking to excess, as well as supportive programs in the community. Two studies, carried out in the United States and Canada, showed that patients did reduce their alcohol consumption as a result of these interventions. This treatment seems to work best with those individuals who are at-risk for alcohol abuse. Those who are already dependent are better off being referred to specialized treatment programs.

Dual-addiction treatment: This method attempts to target both cigarette (nicotine) and alcohol dependencies at once. The use of one of these substances seems to make an individual more susceptible to dependence on the other. The rationale behind dual-addiction treatment is that reducing dependence on one may help a person reduce his or her reliance on the other. Although this is a newer approach to treatment, a recent study seems to suggest that this is indeed the case.
Pharmacotherapy: Finally, if taken on a regular basis, the drug naltrexone, approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 1995, can be a valuable aid in preventing relapse among recovering alcoholics receiving psychotherapy. Another medication, acamprosate, proved helpful in several European trials. (Editor’s note: It is now undergoing clinical trials in the United States.) Zofran, a medication usually used to prevent nausea during chemotherapy for cancer, was beneficial in the treatment of early-onset (i.e. those who started drinking heavily before age 25) alcoholism. Sertraline (Zoloft), an anti-depressant, was found to be helpful in reducing drinking in those with late-onset alcoholism.

Summary

Using proven methods of evaluating medical therapies, recent research reveals that many effective treatments exist to help people to stop drinking and maintain abstinence. These treatments include self-help groups such as AA, psychosocial approaches and medications.

Continued research in the field of alcoholism is likely to produce highly specific medications that will reduce the craving for alcohol. It will also yield an even broader range of therapies, including those mentioned here, that will improve the alcohol abusing person’s chance for recovery.

Over time, those who suffer from alcohol abuse and/or dependence will have even more and possibly better options for successful treatment. In the meantime, effective treatments already being offered by mental health professionals and community groups have been demonstrated to reduce alcohol use and promise a better life for people who make use of them.

Close to a million Americans are treated for alcoholism on a daily basis. For the past 3 decades, the majority of treatments have been empirical and the success of the treatments has never been verified by clinical trials. The numerous methods developed in the treatment of alcohol addiction include the use of medications, psychological, social, behavioral methods and self help groups- all designed to help achieve abstinence from alcohol.

The initial approaches to alcohol treatment were all based on self help and over the years the 12-step self help program has become the gold standard. Other treatments include brief interventions by visiting the primary care physician or trained nurses. Behavioral and psychosocial support therapies have evolved over years and generally involve long term therapy. Over the last 2 decades, motivational enhancement therapy and involvement of the non-drinking spouse have evolved and produced good results.
Of course, over the past 4 decades, pharmacological approaches to alcoholism treatment have made some progress, but the ideal drug still remains to be discovered.

Alcoholism Treatment

The majority of individuals with alcohol dependence initially always deny that they have a problem and are reluctant to undergo therapy. Agreeing to undergo alcohol treatment usually occurs after the individual encounters health, family, employment or legal problems. Depending on the situation of the individual, various treatments are available to help with alcohol dependence. The initial part of the treatment involves evaluation, a brief intervention and either an in/outpatient program or counseling.

Principles of Alcohol Dependence Treatment

Before alcohol treatment can begin, one has to determine if the individual is alcohol dependent. For some who drink socially and are in control over their drinking, treatment may simply require reduction of drinking<. For those who have no control over their drinking, the best treatment is abstinence.

To maintain abstinence, the best approach is to be included with alcohol abuse therapists. These specialists can help develop specific-tailor made treatment plans, which may include objectives, behavioral modification skills, use of self-help manuals, counseling and follow-up care at a treatment center.

Non Drug Residential treatment programs

There are numerous non-drug residential alcoholism treatment institutions and include therapy to maintain abstinence, individual and group therapy, participation in alcoholism support groups (such as Alcoholics Anonymous), educational seminars, spousal involvement, work assignments, physical and non physical activity therapy. Most of these residential programs have professional counselors and staff involved in the treatment of alcohol dependence.

All individuals undergo a complete physical and medical assessment prior to therapy. The essence of all residential programs is to commence detoxification and treatment of withdrawal symptoms that may occur. Hard-hitting psychological counseling and psychiatric treatment is offered to individuals, couples and their families. The principal emphasis of all residential programs is on recognition of the problem and motivation for abstinence. Individuals who are unable to fulfill this basic criteria usually do not succeed with therapy.

Psychological, Behavioural and Social therapy

Numerous behavioral approaches to alcohol dependence treatment include psychological therapy. The primary component of these therapies is motivational enhancement therapy. This therapy is designed to help the individual become more responsible and develop a change in his lifestyle.

Various forms of counseling are available and may involve cognitive behavior therapy to help cope with distorted/abnormal thoughts and help develop a sense of control over these thoughts and feelings.

The majority of pychological therapies often involve the non-alcoholic spouse as most studies show that couple participation increases the likelihood of abstinence from alcohol. Behavioral –marital therapy is a combination of an approach to drinking treatment while strengthening the marital relationship through sharing, teaching and communication skills

Self-Help Programs

The most common self help group in the treatment of alcohol dependence is Alcoholics Anonymous (AA). This is one of the most common and easily available group in any community.

Alcoholics usually get involved with AA before seeking professional help, as a part of it, or as aftercare following professional treatment. Although anecdotal data on the success of AA are plentiful, results indicate that inpatient treatment, a combination of professional treatment and AA, will achieve better results for more people than AA alone. The reason why AA has been beneficial as a treatment for alcohol addiction includes isolating the individual from his social network of alcoholic friends, providing psychological/social support, teaching coping skills and structured behavior treatment.

Physician intervention

Some indivuals receive counseling from primary care physicians and trained nursing professionals. This consists of numerous office visits and counseling. The majority of these brief interventions help those with acute alcoholic crises. Following the brief intervention, all individuals are recommended to enter specialized treatment programs if the alcohol consumption continues.

Drug Treatments

Disulfiram (Antabuse) is an alcohol-sensitizing drug which has been around for at least 40 years. It was the first drug used for aversion therapy. It provides a strong deterrent to alcohol. It is not a cure and does not decrease the craving for alcohol. If taken before an alcoholic drink, it causes a severe reaction that includes nausea, vomiting, facial flushing and headaches. The drug is rarely used today as the severe reaction is not tolerated and most alcoholics are reluctant to take it.

Naltrexone (ReVia), is an antagonist of morphine and has been found to decrease the urge to drink. As is the case with all addiction disorders, however, naltrexone is only effective if taken on a regular basis.

Acamprosate (Campral) is a drug that decreases alcohol cravings and helps maintain abstinence from alcohol. Unlike disulfiram, naltrexone and acamprosate have fewer side effects and do not produce serious nausea and vomiting if alcohol is consumed.

Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first injectable drug to treat alcohol dependence. Vivitrol, a drug similar to naltrexone is administered by an intramuscular injection in the buttocks monthly. It has been shown to decrease the urge to drink by blocking neuro receptors/transmitters that may be coupled with alcohol dependence. Vivitrol has no effect on the withdrawal symptoms due to alcohol. The drug is recommended for use by alcoholics who are undergoing psychosocial therapy and have not consumed any alcohol in the recent past. The drug is also available as a pill, but it has been found that the injectable formulation is easier for individuals recovering from alcohol dependence and only has to be administered once a month.

Even though some drugs may reduce alcohol drinking, it is highly recommended that individuals enter in aftercare programs and prop up groups to help prevent relapse and encourage motivational behavioral and life style changes.

Conclusion

Research supports the idea of using drugs as an adjunct to the psychosocial/behavioral therapy for alcohol abuse and dependence. However, additional clinical trials are needed to identify those patients who will most likely benefit from such an approach, to determine the most appropriate medications for different individuals, to develop optimal dosing formulas, and to develop strategies for improving patient compliance with medication protocols.

With continued research on the effect of alcohol on the brain and behavior, hopefully this will lead to the magic pill. Drugs to decrease alcohol craving are around but specific medications are still missing. In the meantime, the combination of drug therapy and the use of behavioral therapies are the best hope for recovery of the individual -and the lives of loved ones-who suffer from alcohol abuse and dependence.

(HealthDay News) – Sticking to a regimen of prescribed medications is the most effective way to reduce withdrawal symptoms and urges to drink alcohol in those being treated for alcohol dependence, according to a U.S. study.

The study compared two medications (naltrexone and acamprosate) used in combination with two behavioral treatments — low-intensity medical management (MM) and moderately intensive combined behavioral intervention (CBI).

The researchers analyzed data from 846 males and 380 females who took part in the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism’s Combine study, a large-scale, multi-site, combined medication and behavioral treatment study.

The participants were randomly assigned to one of eight different combination treatments involving naltrexone, acamprosate, a placebo, MM, and CBI. After 16 weeks of treatment, the patients’ primary outcomes — including percent days abstinent and time to first heavy drinking — were compared.

"First, high medication adherents fared better than low medication adherents across all combinations of behavioral and pharmacological treatment conditions," Allen Zweben, associate dean for academic affairs and research in Columbia University’s school of social work, said in a prepared statement.

"Second, CBI — a specialty alcohol treatment — surprisingly had a beneficial impact on nonadherents receiving the placebo. This raises the issue of whether or not CBI may serve as a cushion or have a protective function for these patients," said Zweben, the corresponding author for the study.

"Conversely, CBI did not provide similar benefits for naltrexone-treated patients; their relapse rates appeared to be more a function of inadequate exposure to naltrexone and less influenced by CBI," he added.

Overall, specialized CBI did not perform better than the more primary-care MM.

"Both of these behavioral treatments performed equally as well with regard to treatment adherence and medication adherence rates," Zweben said.

The findings show that combing MM and naltrexone could benefit a large percentage of alcohol-dependent patients.

"Alcohol-dependent patients could be managed in nonspecialized or general health care settings, which, in turn, could broaden the treatment options for individuals diagnosed as alcohol-dependent," Zweben said. "We will need to adapt these findings to ‘real world’ medical settings and follow the results."

The study was released online by the journal Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research and was to be published in the September print issue.

ABC NEWS — A study at the University of Western Australia has found that heroin addicts with naltrexone implants are far less likely to return to heroin use than those taking oral tablets.

But critics are sceptical about the study and say that naltrexone is still a risky option for drug users trying to kick the habit.

Naltrexone is a drug which blocks the effects of heroin on the brain. It is usually taken as a tablet, but if heroin users stop taking the pill they often fall back into drug use.

That is why scientists have been working on an implant which automatically releases naltrexone into the body.

Gary Hulse from the University Of Western Australia is confident about the naltrexone’s success.

"It means that you’ve got a a one-stop shop. People can come in, they receive their treatment or implant and for five months or six months, they carry that treatment with them," he said.

The six-month trial involved 69 heroin users. Fifty-four completed the trial. Of the 28 participants who received a naltrexone tablet, 15 returned to regular heroin use. Of the 26 people who received a naltrexone implant, just two returned to heroin use.

Researchers like Mr Hulse say it is a good result for naltrexone implants.

"This is a relatively safe and a treatment which has good clinical outcomes," he said.

The study is yet to be published in a peer-reviewed medical journal, but the team at the University of Western Australia are confident the research will be well received.

"I’m not only confident that it’ll be published in a peer review but I would be surprised if this wasn’t accepted by one of the extremely high rating journals," said Mr Hulse.

But critics like Dr Alex Wodak, from the Alcohol And Drug Services at Vincents Hospital in Sydney, have little time for the new study.

"The paper hasn’t been published yet in a scientific journal and so therefore, it’s the equivalent of hearsay in a court of law. That is, it’s not really evidence," he said.

Naltrexone is a controversial drug. The implants are yet to be approved by Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) and there have been mixed results for heroin users.

Some patients have stopped using heroin after receiving an implant. But others have cut them out of their body or suffered serious side effects.

"The implants, I know for a fact, were at one stage required by the therapeutic goods administration to be stamped, not for use in human subjects, and the authors have conceded that to me in writing," said Dr Wodak.

But researchers such as Moira Sim from the Naltrexone Trial Independent Monitoring Committee say the implants used in the Perth trial were approved by the TGA.

"The committee reviewed all the processes that the trial went through and we are confident that they followed the correct processes that the data was collected properly, and therefore I’m very confident in the results of the trial," she said.

The researchers say the next step will be to conduct a trial comparing naltrexone implants with methadone and other drugs used to control heroin addiction.

Washington Post – When it comes to treatment, the experts think alcoholism needs to catch up to depression.

Three decades ago, long before the dawn of the Prozac Era, depression was a disease rarely treated in its mild form, reluctantly treated with drugs and usually treated by experts only. Today, signs of depression are actively sought, drugs are prescribed early and often, and most cases are handled by nonpsychiatrists.

With alcohol abuse, however, most physicians don’t go looking for trouble and don’t recognize it until it’s breathing in their face. Over-drinking patients often don’t think of looking for help even if they know they are heading in the wrong direction. And society as a rule looks at alcohol treatment as a last-chance, 90-degree corner taken only at high speed.

Simplify screening

All this will change if American physicians adopt the new guidelines for "Helping Patients Who Drink Too Much" promulgated by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, part of the National Institutes of Health.

The idea is to simplify the screening for excessive alcohol use in general medical practice and to convince clinicians and patients that early intervention for drinking that hasn’t yet wreaked havoc is both possible and useful.

"We’re trying to increase the accessibility and attractiveness of treatment to a much broader spectrum of people," said Mark L. Willenbring, a psychiatrist who directs the Division of Treatment and Recovery Research at NIAAA.

Those especially targeted in the guidelines are heavy drinkers who are not yet physically dependent on alcohol but are at risk for becoming so.

"We know that that group responds very, very well to what we call facilitated self-change and brief motivational counseling. We could make that very widely available without much cost," Willenbring said.

A big part of the new strategy is to make primary care physicians — people without specialized training in addiction medicine — think about alcohol abuse the way many now think about depression, anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Which is to say, they need to think of it as something common, diagnosable and within their capacity to treat. The guidelines make this easy: The screening tool for alcohol problems consists of a single question. For men: How many days in the past year have you had five or more drinks? For women: How many days in the past year have you had four or more drinks?

"Most doctors don’t know how to make the diagnosis and don’t really try to do anything about it until it is so easy to diagnose that all you have to do is glance at the patient," said Charles P. O’Brien, a professor of psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania who has been treating alcoholics for 38 years.

"It used to be said that you can’t treat somebody until they are down and out. But when they are down and out, they are really hard to treat," O’Brien said.

Willenbring concurs.

"I think there is a belief that people with more moderate levels of dependence don’t know they have a problem. I think they do. But they don’t think rehab is the model of treatment for them — and I don’t, either."

The sort of therapy both advocate does not involve magic bullets or easy answers or effortless behavior change. But it does enlist pills that help a little, quite a bit of talk and lots of self-discipline.

And what does it get a person?

Perhaps not surprisingly, there’s evidence that getting control of a drinking problem early can improve one’s health, completely apart from the social, psychological and familial benefits it brings.

Looking at death rates

A study published two years ago looked at the experience of 628 men and women who entered alcoholism treatment (either in residential rehab or as outpatients) in their mid-30s and were followed for 16 years.

Over that period, 121 died, or 1.2 percent a year. The average age of death was 48. But the chance of dying was significantly lower in people who after the first year were abstinent or had no drinking-related problems or symptoms.

So how successful is treatment, or at least how successful has it been?

Researchers in 2000 analyzed seven studies, one going back to the late 1970s, in which more than 8,000 people were treated for alcoholism in various ways, including with drugs. After a single course of treatment, one-fourth were abstinent for at least a year and one-tenth dramatically decreased their drinking. The rest, about two-thirds of the subjects, drank less often and in quantities averaging less than half of what they consumed before treatment. Mortality in the first year was 1.5 percent.

Some of those patients had a four-week stay in "rehab," but most did not. A long treatment-center admission as the optimal strategy to stop a serious drinking problem is much more the model of the 1980s than the 2000s. The newer one emphasizes outpatient treatment — occasionally after a brief hospital stay for acute detoxification, if necessary — with care provided by non-specialists in many cases.

How often contemporary treatment succeeds was also explored in a complicated clinical trial of about 1,400 alcohol-dependent men and women, average age 44 and consuming 12 drinks a day, that was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 2006.

The researchers randomly assigned the patients to nine groups. Four of the groups got nine sessions, conducted by a doctor or nurse and lasting at least 20 minutes, that reviewed the health consequences of excessive drinking, encouraged abstinence and attendance at Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, and urged adherence to the study medicines. Four of the groups also got intensive counseling by alcohol-addiction experts — up to 20 hour-long sessions.

Drug therapy

Some of the patients were assigned to take a drug for three months: either naltrexone, which blocks opiate receptors in the brain that are involved in alcohol’s "reward pathways," or acamprosate, which works through so-called GABA receptors to decrease the anxiety and restlessness that can come with abstinence. Some got placebo pills.

A year later, there were no big differences among any of the groups, although there were some interesting small ones. (This was true even with what the researchers considered the placebo group, the people who received specialized alcohol counseling but no time with a physician and no pills.)

People who met regularly with a doctor or nurse and then got either naltrexone or the intensive counseling did equally well; about 66 percent were abstinent. People who had those sessions and got placebos did less well; 59 percent were abstinent. Those who got intensive counseling but no pills, neither active ones nor placebos, had an intermediate outcome, with 62 percent abstinent.

Unlike some other studies, this one showed no benefit from acamprosate. But that may not be the last word.

Interesting findings

A clinical trial not yet published showed the drug worked only when started during a period of abstinence, not while a person was still drinking. And last month researchers reported more evidence that GABA receptors play a role in alcohol addiction. Laboratory rats that got the drug gabapentin, which enhances the action of GABA, drank less — but only if they were already chronically exposed to alcohol. Those that used alcohol only occasionally did not show such an effect, suggesting the pre-existing state was crucial to the response.

Abstinence, in almost all practitioners’ minds, is always the goal. But its absence doesn’t signal abject failure.

"It is a fiction that the typical change process is a sudden transformation," Willenbring said. "The more common is a change process that lasts years and is characterized by lengthening periods of sobriety and shorter relapses until they are gone."

In that way, alcohol abuse is like depression. In another way, too.

"Recovery from depression requires effort. The same is true for alcohol dependence," he said.

And in both cases, he thinks they’re really worth the effort.

PARIS (AFP) — The drug buprenorphine is twice as effective as a rival treatment called naltrexone in helping heroin patients stay off the narcotic, a trial published in The Lancet on Friday said.

The two drugs, along with a dummy pill called a placebo, were tested for 22 months among 126 patients in Malaysia who had emerged from a detoxification and counselling programme, it said.

Buprenorphine, which is marketed as Temgesic or Buprenex, was twice as effective as naltrexone (branded as Revia, Depade or Vivitrol) and the placebo in terms of days of abstinence from heroin and a full-fledged relapse to the narcotic.

Indeed, buprenorphine proved to be so superior that the trial was halted early, as it would have been unethical to continue it to its scheduled end.

The study, led by Yale University’s Richard Schottenfeld, gives support for placing buprenorphine alongside methadone, and both of them over naltrexone, as pharmacological treatments for helping addicts stay off heroin.

The three drugs belong to a class called opioid antagonists.

These treatments are increasingly used to help ease heroin dependence but remain prohibited in some countries, amid suspicions that they are liable to be abused or simply substitute one addiction for another.

The study is important because it gives the first assessment of the relative effectiveness of two of the opioid antagonists.

Heroin and other illicit opiates were once a problem mainly confined to developed countries, but in the past few decades have spread to developing economies and nations of the former Soviet bloc.

China, India, Indonesia, Iran, Malaysia, Pakistan and Russia are among the countries where expansion of heroin use has risen fastest, according to a 2004 World Health Organisation (WHO) paper.